Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 17 de 17
Filter
1.
Vestn Oftalmol ; 139(2): 44-51, 2023.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2299457

ABSTRACT

In patients with glaucoma, the neuroplasticity of retinal cells, their axons and neuroglial elements is pathogenetically reduced, including due to a decrease in the concentration of neurotrophic factors. Coronavirus infections contribute to the damage processes, causing apoptosis of retinal and optic nerve cells. In this regard, the possibility of pharmacological stimulation of the production of these peptides through energy potentiation of the cell mitochondria function, reduction of oxidative stress severity and activation of interneuronal transduction system becomes relevant. PURPOSE: This study aimed to conduct a comprehensive diagnosis of the severity of oxidative stress, identify changes in the neuroplasticity and reparative ability of the retina in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) who have recovered after a coronavirus infection, and are undergoing therapy with the complex drug Cytoflavin. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 40 patients (mean age 57.2±3.6 years) with advanced POAG compensated by hypotensive agents; all of them recovered from moderate Covid-19 30 to 90 days prior to inclusion in the study. Twenty patients of the main group received therapy with the complex drug Cytoflavin, 20 other patients comprised the control group. In the comparison groups, the concentration of BDNF and CNTF in blood serum (SC) was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Overall assessment of oxidative stress was done by high performance liquid chromatography. Studies of the functional activity of the retina were performed using the Tomey EP 1000 electroretinograph according to the standard method. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Retinal photosensitivity significantly improved in patients of the main group taking the complex drug Cytoflavin (mD mean after treatment increased from -7.34±0.62 dB to -4.52±0.12 dB (p>0.001), PSD mean decreased from 6.23±0.21dB to 4.27±0.13 dB (p>0.001)); the neural activity of the retina improved according to PERG (the amplitudes of the P50 and N95 components increased from 0.92±0.04 µv to 1.65±0.01 µv and from 1.83±0.06 µv to 2.68±0.01 µv, respectively (p>0.001), the latency of the P50 and N95 components decreased from 53.40±2.51 ms to 49.37±2.22 ms and from 112.40±5.23 ms to 107.4±8.11ms, respectively (p>0.001); the concentration of BDNF increased (from 18.65±5.32 ng/ml to 20.23±4.05 ng/ml (p>0.001)) and the concentration of CNTF in the blood serum decreased (from 3.99±0.37 pg/ml to 1.85±0.02pg/ml (p>0.001)), the severity of oxidative stress decreased (the indicator of oxidative stress decreased by 1.4 times after treatment p>0.001) and the content of antioxidant protection indicators increased: the indicator of antioxidant protection of blood serum increased by 1.4 times, the concentration of superoxide dismutase - by 1.9 times (p>0.001), glutathione peroxidase - by 1.4 times (p>0.001), coenzyme Q10 - by 4.5 times (p>0.001). CONCLUSION: The obtained data can be used to determine the risk of progression of glaucomatous optic neuropathy in patients with glaucoma who have had a coronavirus infection.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Glaucoma, Open-Angle , Glaucoma , Humans , Middle Aged , Glaucoma, Open-Angle/diagnosis , Glaucoma, Open-Angle/drug therapy , Antioxidants , Ciliary Neurotrophic Factor , Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor , Neurogenesis
2.
Surv Ophthalmol ; 67(3): 637-658, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2248871

ABSTRACT

Glaucoma is an intraocular pressure-related ophthalmic disease with multiple causes that results in an optic neuropathy and vision loss. Intraocular pressure elevation is among its strongest risk factors. While glaucoma is mostly primary in etiology, secondary glaucoma is not infrequent. Recognizing its cause is imperative, since treatment is often different depending on the pathophysiologic mechanism. Numerous clinically relevant ophthalmic infections can result in robust inflammatory responses that may result in pressure elevation or intraocular anatomic configurations that predispose to pressure elevation. Knowing the mechanisms by which these infections can lead to glaucoma is critical in treating, and we consolidate what is currently known in regards to how infectious diseases lead to glaucoma.


Subject(s)
Glaucoma, Open-Angle , Glaucoma , Optic Nerve Diseases , Glaucoma/complications , Glaucoma/therapy , Humans , Intraocular Pressure , Tonometry, Ocular
3.
Psychiatr Danub ; 34(2): 348-355, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1912581

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 epidemic and earthquakes in Croatia during 2020 suddenly disrupted everyday life and caused psychological disturbances in population. The purpose of the present study was to assess the prevalence of anxiety symptoms and the level of treatment adherence in glaucoma patients during the pandemic. The paper also aimed to evaluate the correlation between anxiety symptoms, treatment adherence and treatment outcomes in the studied cohort. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted among primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) patients at the Department of Ophthalmology, Zagreb University Hospital Center, during one year. The Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) was used to measure the level of anxiety symptoms. Treatment adherence was estimated by the Culig adherence scale (CAS). Glaucoma damage was determined for each patient from the level of structural and functional impairment of the worse eye, by retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness and mean defect (MD), respectively. Statistical analyses were performed, with a P value of less than 0.05 considered being statistically significant. RESULTS: This study included 113 POAG patients, with a mean age of 65.89 years. The median of the BAI total score in all patients was 10. According to the CAS, 60.2% of patients were non-adherent to glaucoma treatment during the COVID-19 outbreak. The BAI total score was significantly negatively related to adherence to local glaucoma treatment (p<0.001). A significant negative association was also observed between adherence and MD (p=0.017), while no correlation was found between adherence and RNFL thickness (p=0.228). CONCLUSION: Considerable proportion of patients with glaucoma have shown non-adherence to treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic. Anxiety severity was associated with lower adherence, thus indirectly influencing therapeutics outcomes. Special consideration should be given to the strategies promoting mental health and interventions focusing on treatment adherence in glaucoma patients in a time of emergencies.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Earthquakes , Glaucoma, Open-Angle , Glaucoma , Aged , Anxiety/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Croatia/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Glaucoma/drug therapy , Glaucoma/epidemiology , Glaucoma, Open-Angle/complications , Glaucoma, Open-Angle/diagnosis , Humans , Nerve Fibers , Pandemics , Tomography, Optical Coherence , Treatment Adherence and Compliance
4.
Ophthalmology ; 129(3): 258-266, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1540882

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Emerging evidence suggests that the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is disrupting health behaviors such as medication adherence. The objective of this study was to determine whether adherence to ocular hypotensive medication was affected by the pandemic and to identify factors associated with this change. DESIGN: In this cohort study, we used a controlled interrupted time series design in which the interruption was the declaration of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States on March 13, 2020. The 300-day monitoring period, which evenly bracketed this declaration, started on October 16, 2019, and ended on August 10, 2020. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with primary open-angle glaucoma enrolled in an ongoing longitudinal National Institutes of Health-funded study initiated before the onset of the pandemic were selected if they were prescribed ocular hypotensive medication and had adherence data spanning the 300-day period. METHODS: We applied segmented regression analysis using a "slope change following a lag" impact model to obtain the adherence slopes in the periods before and after the segmentation. We compared the 2 slopes using the Davies test. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measure was daily adherence to ocular hypotensive medication, defined as the number of doses taken divided by the number of doses prescribed, expressed in percent. Adherence was measured objectively using Medication Event Monitoring System caps. We assessed the associations between change in adherence and demographic, clinical, and psychosocial factors. RESULTS: The sample included 79 patients (mean age, 71 years [standard deviation, 8 years]). Segmented regression identified a breakpoint at day 28 after the declaration of the pandemic. The slope in the period after the breakpoint (-0.04%/day) was significantly different from zero (P < 0.001) and from the slope in the period before the breakpoint (0.006%/day; P < 0.001). Mean adherence in the period before the segmentation breakpoint was significantly worse in Black patients (median, IQR: 80.6%, 36.2%) compared with White patients (median, IQR: 97.2%, 8.7%; chi-square, 15.4; P = 0.0004). A significant positive association was observed between the Connor-Davidson resilience score and the change in slope between the periods before and after the breakpoint (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to ocular hypotensive medication worsened during the COVID-19 pandemic and seems to be related to patient resilience. This collateral consequence of the pandemic may translate into vision loss that may manifest beyond its containment.


Subject(s)
Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , COVID-19/epidemiology , Glaucoma, Open-Angle/drug therapy , Medication Adherence/statistics & numerical data , SARS-CoV-2 , Aged , Cohort Studies , Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Intraocular Pressure , Male , Middle Aged , Ophthalmic Solutions , Patients/psychology , Psychology , Resilience, Psychological , United States/epidemiology
6.
Ophthalmologe ; 119(4): 374-380, 2022 Apr.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1427244

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 and 2021 severely restricted the care of ophthalmology patients. Teleophthalmological services, such as video consultation or medical telephone advice could, at least partially, compensate for the lack of necessary controls in the case of chronic diseases; however, teleophthalmological options are currently still significantly underrepresented in Germany. OBJECTIVE: In order to determine the willingness of patients to use telemedicine and the virtual clinic, we conducted a survey using a questionnaire on the subject of teleophthalmology in university medicine patients with known glaucoma as a chronic disease during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A total of100 patients were interviewed. The questionnaire contained 22 questions with multiple choice possible answers. The inclusion criterion was the presence of glaucoma as a chronic disease, age over 18 years, and sufficient linguistic understanding to answer the questions. The data were collected, analyzed and anonymously evaluated. RESULTS: In the patient survey it could be shown that the respondents with glaucoma are very willing to do teleophthalmology and that this would be utilized. Of the patients surveyed 74.0% would accept telemedicine and virtual clinics. Of the ophthalmological patients surveyed 54.0% stated that their visit to the doctor/clinic could not take place due to SARS-CoV­2 and 17.0% of the patients stated that the SARS-CoV­2 pandemic had changed their opinion of telemedicine. DISCUSSION: The acceptance of telemedicine in patients with chronic open-angle glaucoma seems surprisingly high. This has been increased even further by the SARS-CoV­2 pandemic. These results reflect a general willingness of patients with chronic eye disease but do not reflect the applicability and acceptance and applicability from a medical point of view; however, this form of virtual consultation is accepted by the majority of patients with glaucoma and could be considered for certain clinical pictures.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Glaucoma, Open-Angle , Glaucoma , Ophthalmology , Telemedicine , Adolescent , Glaucoma/diagnosis , Glaucoma/epidemiology , Glaucoma/therapy , Humans , Ophthalmology/methods , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Surveys and Questionnaires
7.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 57(8)2021 Aug 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1376900

ABSTRACT

Background and Objectives: This study introduces a novel office-based procedure involving air-blood exchange under a slit-lamp microscope for treatment of severe hyphema after filtering surgery. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 17 patients (17 eyes) with a diagnosis of primary open-angle glaucoma with severe hyphema (≥4-mm height) after filtering surgery. All patients were treated with air-blood exchange under a slit-lamp using room air (12 patients) or 12% perfluoropropane (C3F8; five patients). Results: The procedures were successful in all 17 patients; they exhibited clear visual axes without complications during follow-up. In the room air group, the mean visual acuity (VA) and hyphema height significantly improved from 1.70 ± 1.07 LogMAR and 5.75 ± 1.14 mm before the procedure to 0.67 ± 0.18 LogMAR and 2.83 ± 0.54 mm after the procedure (p = 0.004; p < 0.001). In the C3F8 group, the mean VA showed a trend, though not significant, for improvement from 1.70 ± 1.10 LogMAR to 0.70 ± 0.19 LogMAR (p = 0.08); the mean hyphema height showed a trend for improvement from 5.40 ± 0.96 mm to 3.30 ± 0.45 mm. Compared with the C3F8 group, the room air group showed the same efficacy with a shorter VA recovery time. Conclusions: "Air-blood exchange under a slit-lamp using room air" is a convenient, rapid, inexpensive, and effective treatment option for severe hyphema after filtering surgery, and may reduce the risk of failure of filtering surgery.


Subject(s)
Filtering Surgery , Glaucoma, Open-Angle , Glaucoma , Trabeculectomy , Glaucoma/surgery , Glaucoma, Open-Angle/surgery , Humans , Hyphema/etiology , Hyphema/surgery , Intraocular Pressure , Retrospective Studies
8.
Cornea ; 40(8): 1067-1069, 2021 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1303954

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: We present 2 cases of striking stromal corneal infiltrates months after COVID-19 infection. While we cannot prove that these infiltrates are caused by or directly related to COVID-19, we did not find any other plausible cause that could explain these ophthalmic signs. In these cases, the ongoing process was detected in relatively early stages due to scheduled visits with patients and responded positively to prednisolone acetate 1% ophthalmic suspension. However, we do not know the response to treatment in more advanced cases.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnosis , Corneal Diseases/diagnosis , Corneal Stroma/pathology , Eye Infections, Viral/diagnosis , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/virology , COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing , Corneal Diseases/drug therapy , Corneal Diseases/virology , Eye Infections, Viral/drug therapy , Eye Infections, Viral/virology , Female , Glaucoma, Open-Angle/diagnosis , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Humans , Immune Complex Diseases/diagnosis , Immune Complex Diseases/drug therapy , Immune Complex Diseases/virology , Male , Middle Aged , Prednisolone/therapeutic use , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Uveitis/diagnosis , COVID-19 Drug Treatment
9.
medrxiv; 2021.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2021.05.10.21256978

ABSTRACT

Background: Full immunization with two doses of Covid vaccine has been found to be a critical factor in preventing morbidity and mortality from the Covid-19 infection. However, due to the shortage of vaccines, a significant portion of the population is not getting vaccination in many countries. Also, the distribution of vaccine doses between prospective first dose recipient and second dose recipient is not uniformly planned, as seen in India's various states and union territories. It is recommended to give second vaccine doses within 4-8 weeks to first dose recipients for both the approved vaccines in India; hence the judicious distribution between non-immunized and partly immunized populations is essential. Managing the Covid-19 vaccination drive in an area with a large number of single-dose recipients compared to a smaller number of fully immunized people can become a huge administrative challenge. Therefore, this study was conducted to assess the number of people covered under the Covid vaccination drive in India and analyze the state-wise distribution of vaccines among the non-immunized and partly immunized population. Methods: The Covid 19 vaccination data till 7th may, 2021 was taken from the website of the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Govt of India. From the data available of the number of doses injected, other figures like the total number of people vaccinated, people with two doses of vaccine or full immunization (FI), and those with a single dose of vaccine or partial immunization (PI) were found. The percentage of the fully immunized and partly immunized population was also found. A ratio between fully immunized and partly immunized individuals (FI: PI) was proposed as a guide to monitor the progress of the vaccination and future dose distribution of two-dose Covid-19 vaccines among partly immunized (PI) and non-immunized (NI) population. Results: In India, till 7 May 2021, 16,49,73,058 doses of Covid-19 vaccines have been injected. A total of 13,20,87,824 people received these vaccine doses, with 9,92,02,590 people getting a single dose or were partly immunized (PI), and 3,28,85,234 got two doses each or were fully immunized (FI). Among the states, Tripura and Andhra Pradesh had the highest FI: PI (Fully Immunized: Partly Immunized) ratio of 0.86 and 0.52, followed by Tamil Nadu, Arunachal Pradesh, and West Bengal with figures of 0.48. 0.47 and 0.47, respectively. Telangana and Punjab had the lowest FI: PI ratio among the states at 0.2 each, with Chhattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh, and Haryana following at 0.21. 0.23 and 0.23, respectively. These values are much lower than the national average of 0.33 in India. Conclusion: The FI: PI ratio could help governments decide how to use scarce vaccine resources among first-time and second-time recipients. This simple mathematical tool could ensure full immunization status to maximum people within the recommended 4-8 week time window after the first dose to avoid a large population group with partly immunized status.


Subject(s)
Glaucoma, Open-Angle , COVID-19
10.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol ; 259(8): 2373-2378, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1171733

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The use of face mask is globally recommended as a preventive measure against COVID-19. However, the intraocular pressure (IOP) changes caused by face masks remain unknown. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of wearing surgical and FFP2/N95 face masks during a 400-m walking protocol on IOP in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) patients. METHODS: Thirteen subjects diagnosed of POAG (21 eyes) were enrolled in this study. IOP was measured at baseline, during the 400-m walking protocol and after 5 min of passive recovery while POAG patients wore a surgical mask, FFP2/N95 mask and no mask in randomized order. From the 21 POAG eyes, we analyzed the IOP changes caused by physical exercise with two face masks and without wearing any face mask. RESULTS: At rest (baseline and recovery measurements), the use of the different face masks did not affect IOP levels (mean differences ranging from 0.1 to 0.6 mmHg). During physical activity, wearing an FFP2/N95 mask caused a small (mean differences ranging from 1 to 2 mmHg), but statistically significant, IOP rise in comparison to both the surgical mask and control conditions (Cohen's d = 0.63 and 0.83, respectively). CONCLUSION: Face masks must be used to minimize the risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission, and POAG patients can safely use FFP2/N95 and surgical masks at rest. However, due to the IOP rise observed while walking with the FFP2/N95 mask, when possible, POAG patients should prioritized the use of surgical masks during physical activity.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Glaucoma, Open-Angle , Humans , Intraocular Pressure , Masks , N95 Respirators , SARS-CoV-2 , Walking
11.
J Glaucoma ; 30(3): e47-e49, 2021 03 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-960617

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has impacted ophthalmology practices significantly. American Academy of Ophthalmology and Center for Disease Control guidelines suggest mandatory masking of patients and physicians during outpatient visits. We have recently become aware of a mask-induced phenomenon, whereby the intraocular pressure (IOP) as measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) is artificially elevated due to mechanical interference from the mask. CLINICAL PRESENTATION: A 37-year-old male with a history of primary open-angle glaucoma on triple therapy presented for a routine visit. CLINICAL FINDINGS: When measuring IOP by GAT the right eye measured 16 mm Hg, but the left eye measured 20 mm Hg. The patient's mask was noted to be touching the base of the sensor rod on the tonometer. This patient's IOP was falsely elevated due to the lateral edge of his mask touching the base of the applanation tonometer, changing the relationship between the bi-prism tip and the weighted balance below, and eliminating the weighted balance from the pressure measuring mechanism. The patient's mask was adjusted to ensure there was no touch and repeat measurement showed an IOP of 16 mm Hg in the left eye. CONCLUSION: Recognizing mask-induced alteration in IOP is essential as it could lead to unnecessary escalation of treatment. We recommend flattening the area of mask protrusion during applanation and ensuring that the sensor arm remains clear of the mask while the tonometer tip approaches the cornea, especially at the moment the mires become visible during corneal contact.


Subject(s)
Artifacts , COVID-19/epidemiology , Glaucoma, Open-Angle/physiopathology , Intraocular Pressure/physiology , Masks , Respiration, Artificial/instrumentation , Tonometry, Ocular/methods , Adult , COVID-19/therapy , Comorbidity , Glaucoma, Open-Angle/diagnosis , Glaucoma, Open-Angle/epidemiology , Humans , Male , SARS-CoV-2
12.
J Glaucoma ; 29(12): 1184-1188, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-894677

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has changed how outpatient care is delivered in ophthalmology clinics, particularly with glaucoma care. This case series highlights the need for awareness of fogging and improper face mask fit as causes of standard automated perimetry artifacts in patients with ocular hypertension and glaucoma. CLINICAL PRESENTATIONS: Six patients with the diagnosis of ocular hypertension, glaucoma suspect, or glaucoma underwent standard automated perimetry (24-2 or 10-2 SITA, Humphrey Field Analyzer) while wearing ear-loop surgical face masks. Due to patient complaints of fogging during the testing, low test reliability, and unexpected results, the tests were repeated after taping securely the mask to the bridge of the nose. CLINICAL FINDINGS: Fogging may reduce visual field (VF) test reliability and induce artifacts that mimic glaucomatous defects. VF test reliability can be improved and artifacts minimized following mask taping. In 1 case there was worsening of VF defects after mask taping. This suggests that fogging may also disguise true VF defects. CONCLUSIONS: Fogging can result in unreliable VF testing with glaucoma-like artifacts. Secure taping of the face mask to the nose bridge may minimize this problem and reduce unnecessary additional testing and follow-up visits.


Subject(s)
Artifacts , COVID-19/prevention & control , Glaucoma, Open-Angle/diagnosis , Optic Nerve Diseases/diagnosis , Respiratory Protective Devices/adverse effects , SARS-CoV-2 , Visual Fields/physiology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Algorithms , COVID-19/epidemiology , Female , Glaucoma, Open-Angle/physiopathology , Humans , Intraocular Pressure/physiology , Male , Middle Aged , Ocular Hypertension/diagnosis , Ocular Hypertension/physiopathology , Optic Nerve Diseases/physiopathology , Pandemics , Reproducibility of Results , Visual Field Tests
13.
medrxiv; 2020.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2020.10.11.20210831

ABSTRACT

The transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) becomes pandemic, but presents different patterns in the world. To characterize the epi- demic of coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19) in each countries and regions, mathematical models were formulated aiming the estimation of the basic reproduction number R0. Simple mathematical model, the SIR model, provided lower estimation for R0, ranging from 1.5 to 3.0. However, more elaborate model presented here estimated higher value for R0, 9.24 and 8.0 respectively, for Sao Paulo State (Brazil) and Spain. Additionally, SIR model estimated R0 using the severe covid-19 cases, which are not participating in the SARS-CoV-2 transmission chain.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Glaucoma, Open-Angle
14.
J Glaucoma ; 29(10): 999-1000, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-725362

ABSTRACT

Ophthalmological examination requires a strict contact between caregivers and patients. In the COVID-19 era, this may be a risk factor for virus spread, and the use of facial masks for all in-office ophthalmological procedures has been recommended. In this case-series, we report about some errors in intraocular pressure measurement, that may occur during the slit-lamp examination of patients wearing filtering facepiece masks and N95 respirators. This is mainly due to the greater dimensions of these masks in comparison with the surgical standard ones, and to the presence of a preshaped rigid nose area that may press against the Goldmann tonometer. Special care should be taken when measuring intraocular pressure in these cases.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Glaucoma, Open-Angle/physiopathology , Intraocular Pressure/physiology , Ocular Hypertension/physiopathology , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Respiratory Protective Devices , Tonometry, Ocular , Adult , COVID-19 , Female , Humans , Male , Masks , Middle Aged , SARS-CoV-2 , Slit Lamp Microscopy
16.
medrxiv; 2020.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2020.05.21.20107946

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has already consumed few months of indolence all over the world. Almost every part of the world from which the victim of COVID 19 are, have not yet been able to find out a strong way to combat corona virus. Therefore, the main aim is to minimize the spreading of the COVID-19 by detecting most of the affected people during lockdown. Hence, it is necessary to understand what the nature of growth is of spreading of this corona virus with time after almost one month (30 days) of lockdown. In this paper we have developed a very simple mathematical model to describe the growth of spreading of corona virus in human being. This model is based on realistic fact and the statistics we have so far. For controlling the spread of the COVID-19, minimization of the growth with minimum number of days of lockdown is necessary. We have established a relation between the long-term recovery coefficient and the long-term infected coefficient. The growth can be minimized if such condition satisfies. We have also discussed how the different age of the people can be cured by applying different types of medicine. We have presented the data of new cases, recovery and deaths per day to visualize the different coefficient for India and establish our theory. We have also explained how the medicine could be effective to sustain and improve such condition for country having large population like India.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Glaucoma, Open-Angle
17.
medrxiv; 2020.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2020.04.06.20055467

ABSTRACT

Background In the current COVID-19 pandemic, much focus is put on 'flattening the curve'. This epidemiological 'curve' refers to the cases versus time graph, which shows the rise of a disease to its peak before descending. The aim in a pandemic is to flatten this curve by reducing the peak and spreading out the timeline. However, the models used to predict this curve are often not clearly outlined, no model parameters are given, and models are not tested against real data. This lack of detail makes it difficult to recreate the curve. What is much needed is a simple tool for approximating the curve to allow ideas to be tested and comparisons made. Methods This work presents a Simple Curve Approximation Tool (SCAT) which can be used by anyone. This tool allows the user to approximate and draw the curve and allows testing of assumptions, trajectories and the wildly varying figures reported in the media. The mathematics behind SCAT is clearly outlined here but understanding of this is not required. SCAT is provided online as a downloadable MS Excel workbook with some sample cases shown. Throughout this work, the parameters used are specified so that all results can be easily reproduced. Findings Although not intended as a prediction tool, SCAT has achieved less than 0.5 % error in short-term forward prediction. It also shows a very significant improvement on the pandemic exponential approximations found throughout media reporting. As a comparison tool, it highlights obvious differences between COVID-19 and other diseases, such as influenza, and between countries at different stages of the pandemic (China, Italy and the UK are used here for demonstration purposes). Interpretation SCAT allows for quick approximation of the curve and creates meaningful comparisons and understandable visualisations for COVID-19 and other diseases. Funding None.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Glaucoma, Open-Angle
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL